Home

This section now includes information that relates to free energy, earth changes, weather, and our survival.

 

This file is a mix of notes, letters, and teachings from the past. Included are some thought provoking questions and ideas that explore topics from a radical perspective. Even if you don’t agree with all the ideas written here, please check it out anyway, you will surely stretch your thinking.

 

SCIENCE TEACHINGS ABOUT THE UNIVERSE

 

On December 20, 1989, the Creator instructed our friend to take a message to scientists, Climatologists, Meteorologists, Geophysicists and other people in fields related to the Earth’s structure. We sent this message worldwide as part of our CARING for this home. The letter explains how our dirty, polluted atmosphere and the worldwide oil slicks on the oceans’ surfaces are allowing the Moon to slip-away. If the new WAR causes MORE oil to cover our oceans and MORE destruction to our atmosphere, then storms will greatly increase.

 

As the Moon’s catalytic weather ‘ACTION’ becomes lessened, drastic weather CHANGES will take place. Today scientists totally discount this action because of present theories, theories that are now leading to our destruction. The mental bondage of FALSE theories is now keeping us in a darkened state that SCIENCE THINKS is illumination

 

It is important to go back in history and identify a most crucial point where man’s knowledge took a wrong turn. A Popular Science magazine article dated October 1925, states, “The Einstein theory of relativity soon may fall, and we may have to look for another explanation regarding the mysterious movements of the Universe.  Professor Einstein HIMSELF has just admitted it.” Did Einstein have any further thoughts about OTHER mysterious universal actions?

 

History shows he was constantly trying to find better theories. For example, in the book titled The Life and Times  (of Einstein) by Ronald W. Clark, Page 407 states the following. “On January 10, 1929 about four years after stating his theory of Relativity should fall, he submitted a paper to the Prussian Academy of Sciences. He stated, “For years it has been my greatest ambition to resolve the duality of natural laws into unity. This duality lies in the fact that physicists have hitherto been compelled to postulate two sets of laws—those which control gravitation and those which control the phenomena of electricity and of magnetism… Many physicists have suspected that two sets of laws must be based upon one general law, but neither experiment nor theory has, until now, succeeded in formulating this law.  I believe now that I have found a proper form. I have thought out a special construction, which is differentiated from that of my relativity theory, and from other theories of four-dimensional space, through certain conditions. These conditions bring under the same mathematical equations, the laws that govern the electromagnetic field and those that govern the field of gravitation. The relativity theory reduced to one formula all laws which govern space, time, and gravitation, and thus it corresponded to the demand for SIMPLIFICATION OF OUR PHYSICAL CONCEPTS.

 

The purpose of my work is to further this simplification and particularly to reduce to one formula the explanation of the field of gravity and of the field of electromagnetism. For this reason, I call it a contribution to “a unified field theory”…  Now, but only now, we know that the force which moves electrons in their ellipses about the nuclei of atoms is the same force which moves our Earth in its annual course about the Sun and is the same force which brings to us the rays of light and heat which make life possible upon this planet.”

 

So what happened with this paper? It seems the science community ignored Einstein’s paper because by him only using the WORD force, it negated some mathematical explanation. The word needed should have been able to describe a total variety of like and compatible energies. This word given to us is Magnetism. We were told gravity is compressed magnetism that operates with a pulse and not a wave; therefore with the proper instrumentation we can find a mathematical explanation as to its influencing activity. For example, we were told that magnetism over the surface of the Earth has a total variety of pulse rates that produce various pressures and an energy form that can be captured and utilized.  So would Einstein have been taken more seriously had he said ‘magnetism’ and not the mysterious word ‘force’?

 

At one time we asked similar questions to what Einstein asked. I asked, “How does light travel from the Sun and arrive here as heat when it goes through cold space?” Our answer was, “There are magnetisms in the Universe that they know nothing about. Magnetism is a constant and if they could just get that in their heads, they could figure everything else out.” The mistake is in thinking that the energy of the Sun is very hot, so it must travel here hot. In fact, it travels here as magnetic free energy and manifests as heat only when it transmutes with energy in our earth system. We were told the Sun is not nearly as hot as scientists say it is. Before we go further, let’s take this thinking a little deeper. If the energy from the Sun does not travel as heat but as a magnetic free energy, then the actual distance the planets are from the Sun does not control the heat volume that will arrive at any given planet. 

 

We shared all this teaching over fifteen years ago, and did scientists pay any attention? NO, because scientists and physicists had already constructed new theories based on Einstein’s first teaching and so as a result error upon error cemented together to make a wall of continuing ignorance. These errors are now so woven into our teaching system that when storms happen, as stated in the letter of December 20, 1989, these destructive events will be called an ACT OF GOD. There are many Earth movements and upheavals, which are necessary for the Earth’s continuance, but the STORMS TO COME are caused by events explained in the following letter.  The Creator has been constantly warning us to clean up our act before it is too late.


December 20, 1989

          (Letter sent throughout the world.)

 

RE: Greenhouse Effect

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

It seems that scientists, climatologists, meteorologists, geophysicists and other people in related fields around the world are constructing '‘thoughts'’ as to the physical workings of the atmosphere. Yet these thoughts, no matter how they are put together seem to be missing the mark. The question is what is the mark? Atmospheric scientists tend to look at the energy that creates our atmosphere as though it is made up of isolated particles that are simply interrelated. Did you ever stop to think they are separate yes and interrelated yes but within the same generating force?

 

Let’s consider magnetism, for instance. The magnetism of the earth’s atmosphere really has nothing to do with what is called atmospheric conditions but is directly related to that flow outside the earth’s atmosphere but within our reach. What I’m speaking of are conductive particles that have to do with equal existing conditions within the interior atmosphere of the earth as well as the exterior that surrounds it. Gravitational pull as it is known has nothing to do with the ionic atmosphere. This letter is constructed to help explain how our very survival is dependent on identifying gravity, no longer as an isolated source but for what it truly is—compressed magnetism.

 

The present scientific theories are so far off track that there is ‘presently occurring’ a solar catastrophic event that is totally ignored and when discovered, will be called an ‘act of God’ when in fact human made destructive actions now called advancement are the real culprit. Within the confines of present theories, this event cannot even be addressed; therefore an explanation is in order. Our atmosphere is ‘up in the air’ not because of some happy accident or quirk of nature. Our atmosphere is in its place as part of the needed magnetic circuitry that takes place through particle transmutation which results in the continuous particle interchange needed to maintain this earth’s particle balance system with compressed magnetism (which we call ‘gravity’) being the catalyst for all energy. Gravity, gentlemen/ladies, that invisible force that is thought of as only holding us in place.  But what is that force?

 

For example, it is common knowledge that the moon causes the tides; however, the moon’s true activities are avoided or discounted when mathematical equations try to simulate the physical workings of the atmosphere. Why aren’t they simulated correctly? The reasons I emphatically suggest is that unchanging theories produce just that—inaccurate change. The moon is not just a tide mover but the catalyst for all the earth’s weather conditions. It is therefore of paramount importance to know the why and the how the moon is held ‘where it is’.

 

In a March 23rd, 1911 edition of Nature magazine, a scientist, Charles F. Brush stated that if we were to replace the hold that the earth has to the moon it would require a steel cable 500 miles in diameter yet have no weight of its own. Think of this ‘hold’ as being accomplished by magnetic forces which ‘hold to’ not just the earth’s ‘mass’ but hold equally as well to the ocean and atmosphere. The idea of just the earth being a ‘giant magnet’ is so out of line that it defeats itself. What is the purpose of our being a giant magnet in relationship to the other planets? Are we assuming, gentlemen/ladies that we are an isolated magnetic nothingness floating around? Shouldn’t we begin to see that we are a part of the whole, a major contributor that has a responsibility beyond partial theories?

 

The oil slicks that are presently on the ocean’s surfaces and the thinning ionosphere are part of a deteriorating ‘holding’ base, that base which is imperative for survival. Our cable is not C. Brush’s steel cable—our cable that connects us (in this specific case to the moon) is a cable of magnetism.


Offered for your evaluation is the following and, hopefully science has not grown so self-assured and sophisticated as to close its mind.

 

Close calculation of the moons’ distance from earth should now reveal that the moon has moved, just a pinch perhaps, further away from earth. Don’t underestimate the pinch. As the surfaces of the oceans are covered more with slick, the magnetic hold polarity gets weaker. Think of the slick as an insulation that acts as a barrier. Then as the distance between the moon and earth increases (due to the slipping base) the moon’s catalytic weather ‘action’ becomes lessened until finally drastic weather changes take place. Without the moon mixing the deep cold waters, the deteriorating weather conditions will happen until finally this imbalance will result in a continuous destructive upheaval of the elements.

 

The present teaching is that the sun’s energy is stored within the core of the sun. This leads to a teaching that states there are only so many years left before extinction. Extinction is a result of ignoring what was available for continuance but humans somewhere desired to destroy rather than maintain because, as we know, theories must under all circumstances never be reversed.

 

Again, for consideration, our solar system is designed in such a manner that the magnetic holding action between the moon and the earth is needed to complete a very important magnetic circuit. Our earth is fed free energy in the form of a magnetic light source from Jupiter at a 14-degree angular path.  (See formula, which states C – 2 + 14Z = 710Y + 409.) This energy is then used by earth, as needed, and simultaneously ‘imparts’ energy to our sun, (yes to our sun), where it then ‘does its part’ in helping to sustain the sun’s energy which is again returned to earth.

 

Magnetism is an untapped resource. Electricity alone, fossil fuel, space stations, underwater laboratories, etc., etc., are no longer going to sustain earth. Search as you will, laugh, as you will, tears will flow unless we develop more interest in the survival of humankind and less interest in magnificent theories that are now no longer useful without expanding.

 

Minds were not given to stagnate and people have always suffered because they would not change. Change is evolution. The unlocking of our minds must continue to include and expand the following understanding. The sun is a constant. The light from it is therefore a constant. We need to think of a magnetic system, within our solar system, that is part of the Universe, in the same way as a constant.

 

There is a vast ‘neutral’ magnetic field which has been 'tapped’ by many visionaries. Their operating energy- producing devices have been discredited, destroyed or rejected, one way or another. I personally recorded how the scientific community ‘helped’ to destroy the Rory Johnson fusion motor. For years, information was sent on the Johnson motor, all over the world, to every science group that could be found and to date not one person has asked for more information on this subject.

 

Today, over fifteen years after this letter was sent, storms are now more intense worldwide. Is this action tied to the moon slipping away? NO. Today, scientists talk about how the Moon is moving away, but they call it a NATURAL event, and do not equate its moving away to an increase in the intensity of Earth’s storms. At some point, surely this old letter will be re-read with a more open mind to give Earth’s inhabitants the opportunity to make the changes themselves before nature’s laws become the total influencing factor. Science thinks that because they make up the theories and laws that they can make these laws work as they see fit. What they don’t know is that Nature’s laws bind us. Let’s take one example. There are scientists that hold to the view that the oil is in the Earth for our use, so we can pump it out to our heart’s content. But one of Nature’s laws, which we were given, states that the oil IS NOW being caused to form in the Earth to lubricate the plates.  The oil is being removed at such an alarming rate that replenishment cannot happen, thus the Earth is turning into a rusty wheel and the real shaking hasn’t even started yet.

 

The laws that will be obeyed are the laws of Nature. Another example is the ionosphere, which is the Earth’s energy distribution zone. We were told that the worldwide use of electricity is the primary cause of the ozone depletion. When our ozone is gone, life on the Earth is finished; however, science holds to the view (one of their laws) that electrons are hiding in some grand field somewhere and there is an unending supply. They also say that the problem of the thinning ionosphere is a chemical action, thus allowing them to blame chlorofluorocarbons. What they don’t know is that all electrons are formed from the basic structure of the ionosphere. This structure has an estimated 150 million TONS of radioactive material which was dumped there by exploding more than 100 atomic bombs. The electrons which are now being formed are incorporating this radioactive material causing diseases worldwide. They can prove this by investigating the core structure of the electron.

 

Another law: Science says the radioactivity that they are producing dissipates somewhere in the Earth’s system. What we were told is that all energy is in a constant state of change, forming and reforming. Radioactive particles are being rearranged within not just the Earth’s system, but within the inhabitants that live on the Earth. Thus we have worldwide diseases for which they are trying to find a cause. They even go as far as to say that uranium is to blame and God created uranium. Uranium left in the ground does not produce any effects that are harmful.  But no, scientists instead of using clean magnetic free energy have made radioactive power plants all over the world and now have the problem of what to do with the radioactive waste. 

 

These are just a few of the presently held inaccurate science laws which are harming the Planet Earth and our universal system.

 

There are many theories in our world that have become mental boundaries but if these boundaries would be opened and expanded they would then us serve in a way that is conducive to achieving knowledge and in turn advancement in the scientific community that would benefit all people. For example, the force theories are too restrictive and need to be seriously reviewed. Theories are only as valid as is their application. Holding to theories that are no longer constructive is merely asking for more ozone holes and other disasters.

 

Let’s take a look at the strong force, which science calls the most powerful force because it binds particles together. It is so identified because scientists have not yet learned how the particles unlock themselves. When a new understanding of particle transmutation becomes a reality, science will then call this a weak force, which is inaccurate. Scientists have made the error of equating the force it takes to break apart structures with the weakness or strength of that particular structure and force but when nature works with nature there is no struggle. If scientists would learn to offer particles the proper magnetic field they would see nature at work. Magnetism and the proper use of it is the property that unlocks the molecular lock. The reason a particle does not come apart is because it has no magnetic field to go into! Scientists today use an electromagnetic field and that is the hold. By flowing particles through a magnetic field, they would find that the particles come apart.

 

In calling gravity the feeblest force because it only holds planets in their orbits scientists have misjudged gravity. In an article as far back as 1911 in “Nature”, March 23rd, C. Brush said that to replace the attract hold of the earth to the moon would require, as an example, a steel cable 500 miles in diameter, yet have no weight of its own. Weak Force??

 

The force we identify as an electromagnetic force is very limiting because the name ties electricity to magnetism and locks it into your mind. Evidence has been presented over and over that magnetic flowing current can be put to good use and it does not manifest any electrical properties. A mental separation therefore needs to be made between electron flow and magnetic flow.

 

We see therefore that staying with the traditional position makes it difficult to advance. We cannot simply try to modify these present force theories. Modification is not the answer. Mental restructuring is the key to open the door.

 

For consideration, let us identify a new force theory that allows for the needed expansion to carry people into the upcoming free energy golden age of civilization. Let us group in a positive way all the forces of the universe into three basic ones: light particles, magnetism and molecular structures called electrons. From this premise we can allow the activity of each to work as they are — not as we have insisted they are.

 

Scientists have sought after a fifth force, but just having the need to create a fifth force tells us we have not been viewing structures accurately. Forces don’t hide themselves. The issue herein is not that gravity can be counteracted but that gravity can be seen as it really is, compressed magnetism. From this qualification we can then gain the perspective needed to go forward.

 

What scientists want to call a fifth force is a rearrangement of their molecular structure system within the earth’s framework. Our info shows the simplicity that has been overlooked, avoided and discounted because of a limited idea of how the universe is constructed. People do not know all but if we so choose we may stand on the threshold of a new era that will save this planet. Scientists are seeking to break things into forces but it is all one force working together in each structure, the same force — not a differing one. The ONE force starts as neutral and then takes on the polarity or form necessary to accomplish a purpose.

 

The purpose or polarity is provided to the neutral energy by the Total Mind and Total Energy of the Universe. “Let there be light”, and the neutral energy transforms into light, the thought sets the polarity and so it is with humans. The entire Universe has a magnetic nature of transformation. Take away magnetism and the universal system has no glue. By viewing magnetism as scientists do they have eliminated the working of this force outside of our planet. It is not that there is no gravity (magnetism) outside of our atmosphere, it is that it works on a differing principle. Indeed magnetism is everywhere to some degree, and there are flowing magnetic rivers throughout space that have specific polarities that can be used for travel.

 

Because scientists have decided there is only life on planet Earth, they also have decided that everything everywhere works according to their theories and dictates, but the ozone holes leave them with a question and that question is — where did we go wrong? It will suffice to say that spray cans and chemicals are just a scapegoat, and they know it.

 

We have created technological monsters on this planet and we continue to feed them while they kill us. Electricity is destroying the ozone shield and without that protection physical life as we know it will end.

 

When we come to an understanding that our world and its survival is based on restructuring our thoughts then we will be ready to investigate the field of magnetic energy and magnetic flow and how it relates to our earth and space travel, our earth and the ozone holes, our earth and the whole of the planetary system. Nature seeks to offer us a positive energy that will do for our planet what we are now seeking to do through the acknowledgment of our carelessness. It will be of great benefit if we will begin to understand that we can no longer move against nature but must now utilize what is now being offered for the benefit of the world. We have long overlooked, through greed, the use of magnetic free energy, and the time is now at hand because our planet is soon to find itself extinct if we do not.

 

The Creator Force will reveal to us how the universe functions, we just need to honestly listen.

 

When the formula C – 2 + 14z = 710Y + 409 was handed to me on a scrap of paper many years ago, it was the answer to someone’s question. The thought now is just WHO asked this question and why wasn’t the answer given?  We were told that time within this Earth system is for our benefit but outside the Earth’s realm, time does not exist.

 

About 100 years ago, Einstein asked a question to which the answer is the formula we were given. While reading the book, The Life and Times of Einstein by Ronald W. Clark, I found a statement quoting Einstein, “I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know HIS thoughts, the rest are details.” 

 

I also had that attitude BEFORE the project started. I already had Part #19 (page 88, in the book, Magnetic Energy to Heal the Planet) machined for a Celestial Particle Transmuter. We were given data that, to me, was incomplete; so I asked, “Is this aluminum armature plate, here in my hand, the actual part needed for this motor?”  Like Einstein, my question was direct, as I needed answers to assemble the unit. Guess what! I learned that the Creator is totally into details. All the years of teaching times were all about details.

 

The following answer directed at my aluminum armature plate is written word for word, (received on Feb. 5, 1985- God speaking). “The radical change in the elements produces a captivity of power that is generated from a newly produced source. The capacity of magnetism is in sequence and the exchange of neutrons is inexhaustible. To further prove this, the ions are distributed at random spacing by a molecular change from within the generating source and so when EINSTEIN SAID THAT THE RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP OF ONE PARTICLE TO ANOTHER DIDN’T MATTER, he was in ERROR. Time has proven this to be so. The problem with redistribution has never been the problem. The problem has always been the manner in which the redistribution takes place. When a molecular structure breaks down there is a transfer of energy to the greatest part, which is the attracting force; therefore, we see that all parts are not equal in producing a generating force. The conductive material is therefore of the greatest importance. It is the material that needs to be observed. The ratio of revolutions to the speed of the generating force needs to compensate. When you gear down, less capacitors are needed. North to north creates this effect. Polarity is affected and the desired effect is achieved.  We need to always review this as we think on capacitation and its effect on not only the individual parts, but also the whole. All things are relative to the existing conditions.” (Note: this statement is about the Celestial Particle Transmuter.)

 

I studied this over and over, but was it saying that my aluminum plate COULD BE USED? I did not ask again, but soon after this event, the TiAlCo-B metal was called the proper conductive material for the SAME SIZE armature plate.

 

Einstein had many deep thoughts that were in keeping with information we were given. Let us review a letter he wrote to Marcel Grossmann in April 1901 and add clarifying comments to show how it relates to the formula we were given. His letter states, “I have got a few wonderful ideas in my head which have to be worked out in due course. I am now almost sure that my theory of the power of attraction of atoms can be extended to gases and that the characteristic constants, for nearly all elements could be specified without undue difficulty.

(Note: The Universe functions with the action of attract/attract.)

(Note: we were told that magnetism is a constant.)

 

Then the question of the inner relationship of molecular forces will also take a decisive step forward. Perhaps the researches of others directed to different goals will ultimately prove the theory. In that case I shall then use all I have so far achieved in the field of molecular attraction in my doctor’s thesis.

(Note: we were told all energy is magnetic molecular structures.)  It is a magnificent feeling to recognize the unity of a complex of phenomena, which appear to be things quite apart from the direct visible truth,” (page 52 in The Life and Times of Einstein). (Note: we were told there is only one force in the Universe. Take away magnetism and the universal system has no glue. Magnetism is the property which holds all particles together and magnetism is the property that unlocks the molecular lock.)

 

Also, in this same book, it tells about Felix Ehrenhaft, a friend of Einstein, who held the Chair of Experimental Physics at the University of Vienna.  Ehrenhaft stated, “It is purely a magnetic force that permeates throughout the Universe.” Scientists backed away from Ehrenhaft as he held to the view that the word magnetic force should be taken LITERALLY.

 

I guess timing is everything. If God had someone hand Einstein the formula around April 1901, would he have had a totally different view of the universe? It seems once the THEORY OF RELATIVITY pushed him into the light as the new messiah, the theory was set in stone. Even Einstein could not have changed it at that time.

 

Present theories, which are basically the same as they were 100 years ago, do not allow the formula to be considered; yet it is the answer to Einstein’s question on how God created this world. My shortcoming is that I tried to focus only on parts, thinking that distracting my energy on ‘universal thoughts’ might send the project on a different path.

 

One thought came to mind many times. It was this. ‘As magnetic light came to Earth from Jupiter and formed into 710 units of combustible factors, these factors were identified as a combination of EARTH, air, sound, speed and light. Did this mean the Creator had to have some DIRT – that is earth or matter to start to form the 710 units of combustible factors? I WANTED this answer, but only in my mind, and not as a spoken question at a teaching time. A shocking event happened as I wondered about where the stuff was located which became ‘Y’, the combustible factor.  Was the word EARTH an identifiable LOCATION, a place where air, sound, speed and light all formed into 710 units of combustible factors?  I’m still not positive if this EVENT is a teaching everyone is READY TO RECEIVE, but am now telling it because it needs to be heard.

 

At one time, when the project was about half-completed, our friend was visiting our house—NO TEACHING (we thought). I was telling about a trip I took for Korlow Corporation with an 85 year old business associate from SCORE division of the Small Business Administration, who never would admit to being wrong about anything. I then told how the Sun was going down in the West and I got onto the highway heading in that direction, toward the food plant where I had an appointment to make a presentation on a line of equipment. The old gentlemen said, “Jeddy, (Jerry) how do you know which way to go?” I said, “The Company is due west and the Sun goes down in the West,” He got very upset, saying, “Get off and ask, the Sun, the Sun, I don’t care about the Sun.” Yes, to settle him down, I drove off the interstate to a gas station and asked an attendant for directions. I felt really stupid asking which way was West when you could clearly see the Sun setting. While telling a story about my trip, our friend seemed to be getting a message, because she walked to the center of our living room. 

 

I then said to our friend, “I guess he never knew the Earth rotates once around every 24 hours and that the Sun goes down in the West each night. Are you ready for a shock? Our friend said, “That’s the bondage teaching right there, and God is showing me this.”  She then tried to rotate both hands above her head as fast as possible. We smiled, thinking she invented a new dance. She was very stern saying; “The Earth rotates faster than I can show you, and the energy of our Solar System creates the ILLUSION that the Earth only rotates once every 24 hours. You need to remember you were told that time is put on this plane for our benefit, but out there time does not exist.” The Earth’s rotation gives us time, 24 hours being a day.

 

We wanted to pat her on the head and say thank you, but no, she felt our disbelief. She had us drive to a science display where a fairly fast rotating fan blade was influenced by a strobe light in the room, making the blade appear to be rotating very, very slowly. In fact, one could turn the strobe light knob and make the blade appear to almost stop. Yet, the blade never changed speed. She then said, “God wanted you to see this and think about how our Earth is caused to LOOK LIKE it is rotating once in 24 hours when in fact it is spinning at a very fast rate. I asked her to show me again the speed and she rotated her hands again, approximately 3-5 rotations per second. I said are we saying that the Earth rotates 5 times 60 or 300 times a minute? She replied, “Faster.”

 

Then I said, “How could a solid Earth get the energy to rotate very fast.” We were then guided to read the book, The Awesome Life Force by Joseph H. Cater. He stated that there are giant underground caverns, but NO solid Earth.” He further stated, “Apparently, the entire Earth pulsates in response to the cyclical pattern of the Sun, much like the nature of the fundamental particles.” He then went on to say how in 1962 the Alaska earthquake caused the ENTIRE EARTH to ring like a bell for several hours. This action, he said, should have been positive proof to scientists that the dogma of a solid Earth is the product of shallow and irrational thinking.

 

We were told the Earth rotates very fast, INSIDE A MAGNETIC FIELD. What is this magnetic field?  The formula could very well be this field because the formula was called a “molecular structure just outside the Earth’s rim (Ionosphere) which reads C - 2 + 14Z = 710Y +409.” The Earth’s rim was called our Ionosphere. So, if the 710 units of combustible factors FORM somewhere, they utilize ONLY the Earth’s spinning ACTION as it produces AIR, SOUND, SPEED and LIGHT. The Creator DOES NOT need any pre-made MATTER, such as ‘earth dirt’ (elements) to create the 409 elements.

 

We were told, “You are not the only ones living on Earth.” What did this statement mean? If the Earth is spinning very fast, then just under the Earth’s 800 mile thick outer crust, the inside surface of this crust could manifest as compressed magnetism (or gravity) caused by centrifugal force would allow the people in the inner Earth to function and thrive inside the Earth. This centrifugal force could be why the oceans do not go down into the inner part of the Earth. Their lighting system could be exactly like the magnetic light box included in the book Magnetic Energy to Heal the Planet.

 

As long as RADICAL thoughts are being put forth, here is one that influenced my mind. On the Internet, there is a view from space of Planet Earth. Each major city looks like a cluster of lights. Yes, our Earth looks like a lit-up Christmas tree.  Now, suppose someone FAR from our solar system was viewing our Earth through a telescope and saw this same ‘earth-view.’ Would they say that they had discovered a WHOLE NEW UNIVERSE with clusters of stars (as we keep reading in the newspaper and science magazines)? We were told, “What they think they see is totally influenced by the theory of Optics.” There are many factors that must be taken into account before science can make Correct SIGHTING JUDGEMENTS. The theory of Optics is nowhere near an exact science.

 

I now wish to address the subject of ‘Black Holes.’ For example, we were told the pulsed energy leaves the Sun and is attracted to the Earth four times faster than recorded light waves. So I asked, “If the lit-up side of the Earth is WHITE-BRIGHT, why does the Earth, from space, look like a blue ball?  Does the compressed magnetism of the Earth system ATTRACT the Sun’s energy with SO MUCH FORCE that the reflected light stops going out into space? What makes light STOP being light?” The answer given was, “All light and magnetism travel side by side. When the light isn’t needed any more it stops.” Then I asked, “Did it disappear?” The answer was “No, it returned to a magnetic form of energy.”  We were told “There are magnetisms in the Universe that have only been minutely touched.”

 

In the news today, we hear all this stuff about black holes where light cannot escape. If the light emitting into space from Earth weren’t NEEDED ANY MORE, would someone outside our galaxy say, “The location called Earth is a BLACK HOLE?” Earth was called the vacuum of this planetary system and vacuums are powerful attract locations. This mindset on their part would be reinforced by the so-called Van Allen belts, which would seem to be energy fields, which are trying to escape from the Earth’s black hole. Is it not possible that these two energy fields serve as magnetic poles or stabilizers to keep the Earth rotating at the required velocity? What if these fields actually supply a steady flow of magnetic free energy with each of them having POTENTIALLY DIFFERENT energy charges?  Science always wanted to know why these fields maintain their exact position away from Earth. A fast spinning Earth would give the Van Allen belts their present location because of centrifugal force.

 

To sum up some of the major teachings, which the formula might be telling us, we find that:

a) There is no molten iron core 2,000 miles below the surface of the Earth. All of the energy ACTION now happening (volcanoes, earthquakes, etc.) is because of the magnetic light energy beam, which travels to Earth from Jupiter at a 14-degree angular path.

 

b) The Earth is NOW growing and has been growing larger for a time frame that we cannot even imagine. Yes, at one time I asked how old is the Earth, expecting the answer in years. The message was “Are you looking for a number?”  I thought, “Great, here we go.  Everyone wants a number.”  The message was NOT exactly what was expected. We were to PICK OUR number like maybe take a ONE and then put a million zeroes behind it. I think we were being told that the Universe ALWAYS WAS, so forget asking the age of the Earth. The message then was, “Within your present mental framework, certain knowledge is beyond your understanding.”

 

c) The formula also tells us that the Earth is a major circuit between the energy sent from Jupiter to Earth then from Earth to the Sun. Many times we were told that to check the speed at which the Earth and Sun respond to each other, Science should review atomic/nuclear bomb explosions. EVERY TIME a bomb exploded, the Sun responded within a count of ONE SECOND with Sun flares that have been recorded.  Another example is that Sky Lab’s decreasing orbit was blamed on the scientists who determined the orbit. They said it was not high enough and this caused it to come crashing down.  Science could check the dates/times to prove that every time a nuclear bomb was set off (and there were hundreds) the energy from the Sun flared up and pushed the Sky Lab into a lower orbit. This eventually caused it to crash to Earth when it should have stayed in orbit for many, many years.

 

The Sun’s heat is located basically on its EXTERIOR and it is a magnetic heat not nearly as hot as stated in the present Science teaching. The Sun was identified during our teaching as being BASICALLY HOLLOW proving that the Sun is not the source of the force. Since there is not a core, the Sun needs to get its energy from the center of the Universe then onto Jupiter. This is why in the formula, Jupiter is called the center of our Solar System--not the SUN. One mental block to understanding this is that the planets do not go around Jupiter; they travel around the Sun. The Creator arranged the magnetic circuit to where the planets go around the Sun. To speculate further on why can be done another time. The Sun was created to last forever with only one negative event that could cause it to be destroyed. That was humankind’s FREE CHOICE or the ability to destroy the Sun by destroying the Earth’s magnetic circuit, and this event is happening RIGHT NOW because of the destruction of the Ionosphere caused by the worldwide overuse of electricity.

 

The formula tells where the energy comes from and answers Einstein’s basic question about how God made the world. I asked if the Sun cools, what happens to the Universe? Will it also start to run down causing entropy?  The answer was stated before, but is a point that needs restating. We were told, “The Universe does not operate on our idea of one, two, three order. The Universe does its thing in a pattern as needed while repeating in a random sequence.” This action allows a continuous transmutation process to maintain the Universe as pre-ordained. So, if our Solar System is changed back to pure magnetic free energy, this energy gets recycled to another location. We were told, “Nothing is ever wasted. There are no particle ashes. Everything returns to a particle balance.”

 

I think the Master Builder, Creator of the Universe LIKES to have someone pass along teachings which were sent to us Earthlings, so don’t discount crop circles.  They have messages. For example, there are 409 separate rings in one of the crop circles that just occurred weeks ago. The formula has 409 elements. Wouldn’t it be a real event if the entire formula was printed exactly as we were given it over fifteen years ago? Yes! My hope is that soon magnetic energy will take its rightful place to meet our energy needs and we will usher in our golden age of civilization.

 

Re:  Information about the formula which reads C – 2 +14Z  = 710Y + 409

 

This formula and its history came to mind as I was reading the book titled The Life and Times of Einstein by Ronald W. Clark. It seems a Sir William Bragg, the Director of the Royal Institution asked the Congress in 1927, “Is everything that has already happened a PARTICLE and everything in the future a wave?” It seems his son spoke up and said, “The advancing sieve of time coagulates waves into particles at the moment NOW.”

 

These are very deep thoughts from way back in 1927, but can we see the formula in them?  To find an answer, we focus on a statement printed in the book titled, Antigravity, the Dream Made Reality by John R.R. Searl.  He stated on page 38, “The earth would have been EXPANDING from the Center since it first formed. This was the best explanation for “continental drift; but a reason for the expanding earth could not be found. Geographers would welcome the idea, for the land masses have been shown to fit neatly together on a sphere of about half the size of the earth…”

 

Searl then goes on to say, “The creation fields or glowing magnetic cores at the center of cosmic bodies must somehow originate.”  We were told the formula was very important but at the time our focus was on getting the data to complete the Celestial Particle Transmuter.

 

At this time, let us retrace the events that were happening as we got the formula. In the early months of 1985, God told our partner exactly this, “There is a molecular structure that reads, C – 2 +14Z  = 710Y + 409. We thought that this formula was only to explain the speed of light and we had no interest to get more deeply involved in seeking more understanding.

 

Then, much later on September 24, 1986, I was told the formula was important so I removed the small piece of paper (on which I had written the formula and stuck in my wallet for safekeeping). I read it and asked, “What does the Y part mean?” God told her, “Y is the combustible factor of the elements. These elements are a combination of earth, air, sound, speed and light. In order for an energy to operate it has to exist within these elements.” 

 

I think my next question was “What is energy?”  The answer was, “Energy is the power by which anything acts effectively and changes.” Is this saying the SAME THING as the presently held science statement which is, “Energy is the ability to do work?”

 

Let us ponder some thoughts. When the combination of the 710 units of combustible factors do their transmuting into 409 elements, can we say this action is WORK?  The Creator does not WORK at keeping the Universe in operation, likened to some big WHEEL WATCHER in the Heavens. No, saying “Energy is the power by which anything acts effectively and changes” is the Creator’s message as to what energy is. That is why we were told, “The Creator is Spirit, Total Mind and Total Energy,” and has no need to work.

 

Back to the formula. At that time we were writing a letter to Professor Rowland on November 27, 1987. The subject matter was the ozone hole and WHY storms were more intense worldwide. We were guided to say the following (in part). “There is an inseparable connection between what we now call gravity and the weather here on Earth. By reviewing the action of the barometer, this connection is explained thusly. When a barometer shows activity, we say the weather is changing, but is the weather the cause of the barometer’s movement?  No, it is not.

 

There is a molecular structure, just outside the earth’s rim that reads: C – 2 +14Z  = 710Y + 409. Y is the combustible factor of the elements. These elements are a combination of earth, air, sound, speed and light. In order for an energy to operate it has to exist within these elements. It is important to note that light is not the major factor here. The weather has nothing to do with what is called ‘atmospheric conditions,’ but is caused by a particle (see formula) that is outside the earth’s atmosphere but within reach. Since this particle has to do with equal existing conditions within the earth’s atmosphere, it needs a work arm or force to carry out its commands. This force now is identified as gravity and that evaluation is the mental boundary. Gravity is not a giant magnet in the earth pulling everything downward; gravity is compressed magnetism. This compressed magnetism within the earth continually changes its compression ever so slightly because of the particle balance system just outside the earth’s rim. It is vital that this balance system be kept intact…” We were told that the shaking has not even started yet. Storms will increase in intensity with a continuous upheaval of the elements as the Earth tries to bring itself back into balance. 

 

Now back to focusing on the formula as it relates to “waves coagulating into particles,” as stated by William Bragg’s son. If the Creator caused the Earth to GROW likened to a seed growing a tree, then why wouldn’t this same plan be used to GROW every single star in the heavens? 

 

This is not a brand new thought. About 1914, a Dr. De Broglie had an idea, which he said was GUIDED by Einstein. He said, “I had a sudden inspiration. Einstein’s wave particle dualism was an absolutely general phenomenon extended to all physical nature and that being the case, the motion of all particles, photons, electrons, protons or any other, must be associated with the propagation of a wave.”  Very interesting. We might ask, was the Creator trying to give someone the formula way back in 1914?

 

Today, maybe science thinks these are silly questions but not too long ago they were asking these very questions.  For example, at the Solvay Congress held in 1930 in Vienna, the central question became, “Was it or was it not theoretically possible to ascertain the position of a particle and also its momentum at one specific moment?” The book titled, Magnetic Energy to Heal the Planet has enough data given by the Creator to probably figure out this answer.

 

This seems paradoxical, because just after writing this I wanted to say my job is done, it is too much mind twisting to take these thoughts further.  But as Einstein said, “The important thing is not to stop questioning, because curiosity has its own reason for existence. One cannot help but be in awe when (one) contemplates the mysteries of eternity.”

 

I will attempt to answer the Solvay Congress’ question if they would allow me to pick the particle, which is to be checked for its momentum. I will start with the teaching that magnetism is the property which is holding the particle in question together.  Thus, its momentum would need to be recorded as a magnetic PULSE RATE because everything is made of magnetic structural polarities.

 

In that an electron is the by-product of a troubled magnetic field, I would push an almost invisible copper wire through a microscopic volume of north/south magnets and attempt to watch the electron form.  All electricity is the by-product of a troubled magnetic field. If we restrict the amount of PUSH through this north/south field and control the copper volume, which is cutting the lines of force, then we have but one more action to control.  We need to cause an ON/OFF action to the magnets, which would then totally control the NUMBER of flux lines that will be troubled. Theoretically, if WATCHING the electron FORM does not affect its ‘forming action’ then yes, we can ascertain the position of a particle called an electron being formed.

 

Throughout all the years of teaching, NOT ONCE did the Creator say that electrons can be found SPINNING around atoms. All electrons are formed, then transmute back into neutral magnetism, and then reform again. I was thinking this was just fine but ‘SCHOOL teaching’ had me adding how many electrons traveled around this and that.  Is this teaching now part of the ‘wall of continued ignorance’ as present theories were called.  Why is this ‘electron spin’ teaching so damaging?  I finally found one reason.  Indirectly this teaching reinforces the big-bang theory. Here is the connection.

 

Scientists, during the year 1925 held to the view that “The electron in the BOHR atom was jumping from one orbit to another without obvious CAUSE. They wondered, was there perhaps no real cause for such movements.” If there were no identifiable cause, then were events SOLELY BY CHANCE?

 

This thought process reinforced the idea of the Universe running down because when testing electrons they found an energy LOSS from one end of the electron flow to the next. As long as electrons were not viewed as being FORMED then the action of magnetism being a constant had no chance to be reviewed. We were told electrons do not just disappear but always return to a particle balance. This particle balance has to do with a particular magnetic polarity. If something causes a change to the given magnetic polarity of a particle then the observed action of one electron jumping over to another place becomes the balancing activity. The movement of every single electron has a particular reason. It never moves without a purpose. That is the activity that is in keeping with the statement that magnetism is a constant, thus when a molecular structure breaks down and is USED to its maximum potential it FORMS a new molecular structure.

 

I asked, at one time, “Surely something FEEDS the Earth system IF the teaching about everything running down (entropy) is false.” I think the answer given which FITS this comment was as follows. It reads (in part) “The generating force of the ionic atmosphere is not produced by the calculative measurement of neutrons but by the co-existence of energy within the structure of the Universe…”  What are we talking about here?  The Creator told us that “Energy is the power by which anything acts effectively and changes. The Creator is the Energy and is constantly making changes that act effectively to keep the Universe functioning. One of these changes then must be that God is creating the conditions by which there is a co-existence of energy within the structure of the Universe. Now we get a better view of what it means to say that energy is not work. So with all that activity, God is not working, God is manifesting as Substance which is Spirit—Total Mind and Total Energy.

 

Subject: Unified Field Theory

 

Would a running Celestial Particle Transmuter serve as proof for a Unified Field Theory?

 

A call from the past. I thought my writing on this scientific stuff ended with after years of not hearing from this person, he called to again seek my help to construct an anti-gravity device. I was run down with trying to tell him gravity is simply compressed magnetism but he never for a moment could believe it.  Yes, he was smart enough to teach advanced science in a University, but constructing some anti-gravity hardware consumed his total life.  It was difficult to simply say, ‘I’m not interested,’ while wondering if all scientists felt like he did.

 

Yes, during one of the teaching times, I did ask for some method to show visible PROOF that gravity is compressed magnetism. The answer given is on page 95 in the book, Magnetic Energy to Heal the Planet, where it tells about how a ball bearing is pulled off a permanent magnet by a piece of iron.  The ball continues to adhere to the iron even many inches away from the magnet. In fact I took this very ball test to the International Convention for Free Energy and showed this test to MANY people.  Not one person said it proved a single thing about how gravity is compressed magnetism. I talked myself blue trying to say the ball stays on the iron because the PUSH of the compressed magnetism cannot happen because the iron is blocking this energy’s movement downward. Because of this, the steel ball has NO weight.  Forget it.  It seemed I was trying to swim upstream getting nowhere. However, something kept me going because surely science wanted an overview of a grand Unified Field Theory.  In my mind was the thought that if scientists only knew that there is no such thing as gravity (only that this force is compressed magnetism) surely it explains EVERYTHING.

 

Well the science community spent a lot of effort identifying so called weak forces, strong forces, electromagnetic forces, electrostatic forces, and so on including the force of gravity.  Thus it seems that NOBODY has the right to explain all these forces as compressed magnetism.  It is too SIMPLE.

 

For example, Albert Einstein stated, “It would of course be a great step forward if we succeeded in combining the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field into a single structure. Only then could the era in theoretical physics inaugurated by Faraday and Clerk Maxwell be brought to a satisfactory close.”

 

This subject has some humor to it.  When we got the recorded message that gravity is simply compressed magnetism, my actual thought was, “let’s not change the subject, I’d rather keep our focus on the magnet motor parts.”   And here we were being given knowledge that EINSTEIN searched for all his life. There is something here to laugh or cry about, but who knows which.

 

It seems as I write on this subject that the best way to get interesting ‘READING’ is to ask myself questions and then write answers which do not conflict with data given over the many years of ‘teaching times.’  So the first question might be to ask, “Exactly WHAT would Einstein have had to see to bring the era in theoretical physics to a close?  What if he had a piece of TiAlCo-B metal and simply extracted usable energy directly from it?  Would he say that the gravity hitting this metal was compressed magnetism?  Probably not, because the teaching is that all magnetism is a by-product of electricity, when in fact all electricity is a by-product of a troubled MAGNETIC FIELD. They got their wires crossed by putting the cart before the horse.

 

This business of trying to tie electricity to gravity has had interesting consequences. For example, some years ago a Professor Francis E. Nipher of the St. Louis Academy of Science proved by laboratory experiments that Gravitation can be nullified and even converted into repulsion by electric currents properly applied.  In fact, about November 8, 1917, Professor Nipher had positive evidence that gravitational attraction cannot only be suspended or nullified by the electrical current but it actually can be transformed into a ‘gravitational repulsion.’  This experiment was repeated time and again, always with the same result.

 

We need to focus on HOW his experiment might have actually been proving that gravity is compressed magnetism.  Why? We can be found to have CLOSED MINDS by saying he never actually accomplished this test. It seems he had two lead spheres hanging close to each other, and then charged each ball for 15 or 20 minutes with an alternating current of 20 amperes. The results were that the downward weight of the lead spheres was reduced to zero and then the lead spheres moved AWAY from each other.

 

All the flowing electricity is the product of a troubled magnetic field. So the lead spheres took on a magnetic charge that responded to the compressed magnetism that was giving the lead spheres their original weight.  We now go back to the BIG picture about this Earth’s energy field. Everything that has weight has it because the compressed magnetism moves things DOWNWARD.  So, when a (for example) mill hammer is raised to a needed given distance, it falls downward with a force that can smash heated steel bars.  How did this hammer STORE the energy?

 

At one of the teaching times, I asked, “How does gravity actually work?”  This question was put forth even after we were given the compressed magnetism data. I have the recorded answer given on October 2, 1986. It reads, “UP is to high as LOW is to down, ATTRACT is to PUSH as PULL is to REPEL. As something falls to the Earth, it is being PUSHED by molecular structures in the atmosphere and attracted by the Earth SIMULTANEOUSLY.”

 

For weeks I tried to forget this answer about  up is to high, etc.” because it was just too much of a mind twister. Then on November 2, 1986, I focused on these molecular structures in the atmosphere by asking, “What actually happens when a molecular structure breaks down or what event causes a molecular structure to break down?”  The Creator inspired her to write the following. “When it is used to its maximum potential, the molecular structure breaks down and forms a new molecular structure.  All energy is a molecular structure. As something falls to the Earth, it does not break down molecular structures; it merely disperses them. Magnetic structural polarities exist in all things and in all differing measure. The molecular structures in the path of the falling object get transmuted from their NORMAL attract together state and JOIN again throughout the falling object to form two distinct and different forces, a push and a pull with one force not able to manifest without the other. Thus, the increasing downward intensity is dependent on the volume of these COLLECTED molecular structures during the downward movement of the object.”

 

It seems we were told a falling object acquires a certain magnetic charge that can be measured with the CORRECT magnetic metering system.  So, if we take the gravitation experiments of Professor Nipher, we can envision having a TEST falling object CARRY with it a capacitor type charge (connected to a long grounding wire).  When discharged, the object’s released energy could negate the acquired magnetic charge and simply allow the object to land on Earth without a crushing downward force.  I wondered, why did this subject about compressed magnetism get FOCUSED toward HOW molecular structures break down? What’s the connection?

 

It seems that the scientific community wants answers that address the generation or destruction of an atom or electron or whatever other items to which they gave names. Getting this basic knowledge they THINK that the origin of gravitation will finally be understood.  So where does the compressed magnetism (gravity) actually start and how did it get there?  All of everything is a form of magnetism but within the Earth’s system, the magnetism is MORE compressed than in outer space.  This compressed magnetism is the catalyst for ALL energy and it co-exists, and is sustained by the energy of the Universe.  So the compressed magnetism is not derived from the aether, it IS the very energy of the Universe. 

 

As we were told that the compressed magnetism manifests as PULSES not WAVES, does this knowledge offer some HOPE of experimental verification to finally prove that gravity is in fact compressed magnetism?  This answer hopefully is yes and one day testing will show (as we were told) that this compressed magnetism is NOT the same for all parts of the Earth’s surface. This compressed magnetism, being a force throughout the Universe manifests as a pulse in order to travel at the needed speed that is an ALMOST infinite velocity. 

 

It would seem then that ONLY when this compressed magnetism is actively being TRANSMUTED into other forms of energy would it offer a SPEED FACTOR, which can be recorded.  This could be why we were told that “a blending of magnetic circuitry is the method to capture this energy for recording purposes.”

 

Printed in Nature, dated March 23, 1911, Professor Charles F. Brush states in part, “My own view of gravitation differs from other teachings.  I believe that kinetic energy of the aether is the fundamental cause of gravitation and that a gravitating body plays a secondary ROLE only in DISTURBING the normally uniform distribution of the aether's energy,…

 

This statement comes closest to the teachings we were given. We were told, “There is only ONE FORCE- take away magnetism and the Universal system has no glue.”  Today, most physicists hold to the view that it is a GRAVITATIONAL pull that keeps the ionic atmosphere in place.  This concept was called a state of confinement that spells DOOM for Earth. WHY? Would changing this force's NAME to ‘compressed magnetism’ open some door of understanding?  The answer must be YES, but how is that possible?  I’ll print the answer given, but this answer demands a lot of deep thought.

 

Recorded around 1985, it reads in part, “The magnetic field of the collective bodies within the Universe has nothing to do with the principle of magnetic energy. It does have to do with a source of energy thought about but untapped by humankind.  Untapped because theories have already been formed as mental boundaries restricting man’s inventive possibilities.  Humankind is on a threshold of being able to review all of the impossibilities that they themselves have made impossible previously.  There is available an unlimited, untapped resource of energy, yet man thinks that the beginning and end of it are encompassed only within the Earth.  He is about to learn how wrong he is.”

 

One moment: Let us assume time as we see it, as we measure it, does not apply to the Universe. Events truly occur in only one moment of now.  How is it that we can exist with the perception of events occurring one after another yet still be in the same moment without the existence of time? What is changing is the vibrational state of things, we are all passing through the perception of change which occurs through a vibrational shift. The earth is a multidimensional energy system that facilitates an infinitely complex array of vibrational shifting for all interactions within its system. All events that have occurred are occurring right now, it is our perception that keeps moving forward. In the moment of now, which is all there is, any event can be viewed by perceiving that event's vibrations. So if everything already exists, then how do we have the ability to choose? Aren't all of our choices already made? All possible events already exist for people to perceive. The earth is constantly receiving instantaneously all the energy necessary, all the combinations of vibrations necessary, at every moment to make our perceptual experience fully functioning. We are free to choose any possible path and the energy will instantly be provided for us to experience, or literally create anything we want. How does the earth facilitate this storage of events within its system? The earth vibrates extremely fast allowing a whole new set of events to be stored with each new vibration. All eternity happens in one moment in the sense that an infinite number of events can happen simultaneously. The events do not spread out horizontally across a time line, but they happen simultaneously, with our perception moving through them. It may help to view time vertically, instead of horizontally, as if all events are happening in one moment as we view some of them. The earth spins at a nearly infinite velocity to accommodate the magnetic system of vibration for storing an infinite number of events simultaneously. The earth does not look like a blur because of the syncronization we have with the earth vibrationally. Our entire existence and our perception of our existence all relates to our vibrational state. An analogy would be the many ways cars can be viewed while driving on a freeway. Standing still, the cars drive by as we view them, driving in the same direction we observe the cars around us at similar speeds, driving in the opposite direction we see even less detail of the cars as they speed by. If you could keep your perception still, you would observe life's events pass by like standing on the side of the road. You can move your perception quickly through time to see many events happen quickly. Or you can do what you normally do and perceive events as you move along with them. Each perception change is a change in vibration.

 

Now let's take the analogy a little further. All existence, all events, all matter exists at certain vibrations. Stand in one spot and view the physical