This
section now includes information that relates to free energy, earth changes,
weather, and our survival.
This file
is a mix of notes, letters, and teachings from the past. Included are some
thought provoking questions and ideas that explore topics from a radical perspective. Even if you don’t agree with all the ideas
written here, please check it out anyway, you will surely stretch your
thinking.
SCIENCE TEACHINGS ABOUT THE UNIVERSE
On
As the Moon’s catalytic
weather ‘ACTION’ becomes lessened, drastic weather CHANGES will take place.
Today scientists totally discount this action because of present theories,
theories that are now leading to our destruction. The mental bondage of FALSE
theories is now keeping us in a darkened state that SCIENCE THINKS is
illumination
It is important to go back in history and identify a most crucial point
where man’s knowledge took a wrong turn. A Popular Science magazine article
dated October 1925, states, “The Einstein theory of relativity soon may fall,
and we may have to look for another explanation regarding the mysterious
movements of the Universe. Professor
Einstein HIMSELF has just admitted it.” Did Einstein have any further thoughts
about OTHER mysterious universal actions?
History shows he was
constantly trying to find better theories. For example, in the book titled The
Life and Times (of Einstein) by
Ronald W. Clark, Page 407 states the following. “On
The purpose of my work is to
further this simplification and particularly to reduce to one formula the
explanation of the field of gravity and of the field of electromagnetism. For
this reason, I call it a contribution to “a unified field theory”… Now, but only now, we know that the force
which moves electrons in their ellipses about the nuclei of atoms is the same
force which moves our Earth in its annual course about the Sun and is the same
force which brings to us the rays of light and heat which make life possible
upon this planet.”
So what happened with this
paper? It seems the science community ignored Einstein’s paper because by him
only using the WORD force, it negated some mathematical explanation. The word
needed should have been able to describe a total variety of like and compatible
energies. This word given to us is Magnetism. We were told gravity is
compressed magnetism that operates with a pulse and not a wave; therefore with
the proper instrumentation we can find a mathematical explanation as to its
influencing activity. For example, we were told that magnetism over the surface
of the Earth has a total variety of pulse rates that produce various pressures
and an energy form that can be captured and utilized. So would Einstein have been taken more
seriously had he said ‘magnetism’ and not the mysterious word ‘force’?
At one time we asked similar
questions to what Einstein asked. I asked, “How does light travel from the Sun
and arrive here as heat when it goes through cold space?” Our answer was,
“There are magnetisms in the Universe that they know nothing about. Magnetism
is a constant and if they could just get that in their heads, they could figure
everything else out.” The mistake is in thinking that the energy of the Sun is
very hot, so it must travel here hot. In fact, it travels here as magnetic free
energy and manifests as heat only when it transmutes with energy in our earth
system. We were told the Sun is not nearly as hot as scientists say it is.
Before we go further, let’s take this thinking a little deeper. If the energy
from the Sun does not travel as heat but as a magnetic free energy, then the
actual distance the planets are from
the Sun does not control the heat volume that will arrive at any given
planet.
We shared all this teaching
over fifteen years ago, and did scientists pay any attention? NO, because
scientists and physicists had already constructed new theories based on
Einstein’s first teaching and so as a result error upon error cemented together
to make a wall of continuing ignorance. These errors are now so woven into our
teaching system that when storms happen, as stated in the letter of
(Letter sent throughout the world.)
RE: Greenhouse Effect
To Whom It May Concern:
It seems that scientists,
climatologists, meteorologists, geophysicists and other people in related fields
around the world are constructing '‘thoughts'’ as to the physical workings of
the atmosphere. Yet these thoughts, no matter how they are put together seem to
be missing the mark. The question is what is the mark? Atmospheric scientists
tend to look at the energy that creates our atmosphere as though it is made up
of isolated particles that are simply interrelated. Did you ever stop to think
they are separate yes and interrelated yes but within the same
generating force?
Let’s consider magnetism, for
instance. The magnetism of the earth’s atmosphere really has nothing to do with
what is called atmospheric conditions but is directly related to that flow outside
the earth’s atmosphere but within our reach. What I’m speaking of are
conductive particles that have to do with equal existing conditions within the
interior atmosphere of the earth as well as the exterior that surrounds it.
Gravitational pull as it is known has nothing to do with the ionic
atmosphere. This letter is constructed to help explain how our very survival is
dependent on identifying gravity, no longer as an isolated source but for what
it truly is—compressed magnetism.
The present scientific theories
are so far off track that there is ‘presently occurring’ a solar catastrophic
event that is totally ignored and when discovered, will be called an ‘act of
God’ when in fact human made destructive actions now called advancement
are the real culprit. Within the confines of present theories,
this event cannot even be addressed; therefore an explanation is in order. Our
atmosphere is ‘up in the air’ not because of some happy accident or quirk of
nature. Our atmosphere is in its place as part of the needed magnetic circuitry
that takes place through particle transmutation which results in the continuous
particle interchange needed to maintain this earth’s particle balance system
with compressed magnetism (which we call ‘gravity’) being the catalyst for all
energy. Gravity, gentlemen/ladies, that invisible force that
is thought of as only holding us in place. But what is that force?
For example, it is common
knowledge that the moon causes the tides; however, the moon’s true
activities are avoided or discounted when mathematical equations try to
simulate the physical workings of the atmosphere. Why aren’t they simulated
correctly? The reasons I emphatically suggest is that unchanging theories
produce just that—inaccurate change. The moon is not just a tide mover but the
catalyst for all the earth’s weather conditions. It is therefore of
paramount importance to know the why and the how the moon is held
‘where it is’.
In a
The oil slicks that are
presently on the ocean’s surfaces and the thinning ionosphere are part of a
deteriorating ‘holding’ base, that base which is imperative for
survival. Our cable is not C. Brush’s steel cable—our cable that connects us
(in this specific case to the moon) is a cable of magnetism.
Offered for your evaluation is the following and, hopefully science has not
grown so self-assured and sophisticated as to close
its mind.
Close calculation of the
moons’ distance from earth should now reveal that the moon has moved, just a
pinch perhaps, further away from earth. Don’t underestimate the pinch.
As the surfaces of the oceans are covered more with slick, the magnetic hold
polarity gets weaker. Think of the slick as an insulation that acts as a
barrier. Then as the distance between the moon and earth increases (due to the
slipping base) the moon’s catalytic weather ‘action’ becomes lessened until
finally drastic weather changes take place. Without the moon mixing the deep
cold waters, the deteriorating weather conditions will happen until finally
this imbalance will result in a continuous destructive upheaval of the
elements.
The present teaching is that
the sun’s energy is stored within the core of the sun. This leads
to a teaching that states there are only so many years left before extinction.
Extinction is a result of ignoring what was available for continuance but
humans somewhere desired to destroy rather than maintain because, as we know,
theories must under all circumstances never be reversed.
Again, for consideration, our
solar system is designed in such a manner that the magnetic holding action
between the moon and the earth is needed to complete a very important magnetic
circuit. Our earth is fed free energy in the form of a magnetic light
source from Jupiter at a 14-degree angular path. (See formula, which states C – 2 + 14Z
= 710Y + 409.) This energy is then used by earth, as needed, and simultaneously
‘imparts’ energy to our sun, (yes to our sun), where it then ‘does its part’ in
helping to sustain the sun’s energy which is again returned to earth.
Magnetism is an untapped
resource. Electricity alone, fossil fuel, space stations, underwater
laboratories, etc., etc.,
are no longer going to sustain earth. Search as you
will, laugh, as you will, tears will flow unless we develop more interest in
the survival of humankind and less interest in magnificent theories that are now
no longer useful without expanding.
Minds were not given to
stagnate and people have always suffered because they would not change. Change
is evolution. The unlocking of our minds must continue to include and expand
the following understanding. The sun is a constant. The light from it is
therefore a constant. We need to think of a magnetic system, within our solar
system, that is part of the Universe, in the same way
—
as a constant.
There is a vast ‘neutral’
magnetic field which has been
'tapped’ by many visionaries. Their
operating energy- producing devices have been discredited, destroyed or
rejected, one way or another. I personally recorded how the scientific
community ‘helped’ to destroy the Rory Johnson fusion motor. For years,
information was sent on the Johnson motor, all over the world, to every science
group that could be found and to date not one person has asked for
more information on this subject.
Today, over fifteen years
after this letter was sent, storms are now more intense worldwide. Is this
action tied to the moon slipping away? NO. Today, scientists talk about how the Moon is moving away, but they call
it a NATURAL event, and do not equate its moving away to an increase in the
intensity of Earth’s storms. At some point, surely this old letter will be
re-read with a more open mind to give Earth’s inhabitants the opportunity to
make the changes themselves before nature’s laws become the total influencing
factor. Science thinks that because they make up the theories and laws that
they can make these laws work as they see fit. What they don’t know is that
Nature’s laws bind us. Let’s take one example. There are scientists that hold
to the view that the oil is in the Earth for our use, so we can pump it out to
our heart’s content. But one of Nature’s laws, which we were given, states that
the oil IS NOW being caused to form in the Earth to lubricate the plates. The oil is being removed at such an alarming
rate that replenishment cannot happen, thus the Earth is turning into a rusty
wheel and the real shaking hasn’t even started yet.
The laws that will be obeyed
are the laws of Nature. Another example is the ionosphere, which is the Earth’s
energy distribution zone. We were told that the worldwide use of electricity is
the primary cause of the ozone depletion. When our ozone is gone, life on the
Earth is finished; however, science holds to the view (one of their laws) that
electrons are hiding in some grand field somewhere and there is an unending
supply. They also say that the problem of the thinning ionosphere is a chemical
action, thus allowing them to blame chlorofluorocarbons. What they don’t know
is that all electrons are formed from the basic structure of the ionosphere.
This structure has an estimated 150 million TONS of radioactive material which
was dumped there by exploding more than 100 atomic bombs. The electrons which
are now being formed are incorporating this
radioactive material causing diseases worldwide. They can prove this by
investigating the core structure of the electron.
Another law: Science says the
radioactivity that they are producing dissipates somewhere in the Earth’s system.
What we were told is that all energy is in a constant state of change, forming
and reforming. Radioactive particles are being rearranged within not just the Earth’s
system, but within the inhabitants that live on the Earth. Thus we have
worldwide diseases for which they are trying to find a cause. They even go as
far as to say that uranium is to blame and God created uranium. Uranium left in
the ground does not produce any effects that are harmful. But no, scientists instead of using clean
magnetic free energy have made radioactive power plants all over the world and
now have the problem of what to do with the radioactive waste.
These are just a few of the
presently held inaccurate science laws which are harming the Planet Earth and
our universal system.
There are many theories in
our world that have become mental boundaries but if these boundaries would be
opened and expanded they would then us serve in a way that is conducive to achieving
knowledge and in turn advancement in the scientific community that would
benefit all people. For example, the force theories are too restrictive and
need to be seriously reviewed. Theories are only as valid as is their
application. Holding to theories that are no longer constructive is merely
asking for more ozone holes and other disasters.
Let’s take a look at the strong
force, which science calls the most powerful force because it binds particles
together. It is so identified because scientists have not yet learned how the
particles unlock themselves. When a new understanding of particle transmutation
becomes a reality, science will then call this a weak force, which is
inaccurate. Scientists have made the error of equating the force it takes to
break apart structures with the weakness or strength of that particular
structure and force but when nature works with nature there is no struggle. If
scientists would learn to offer particles the proper magnetic field they would
see nature at work. Magnetism and the proper use of it is the property that
unlocks the molecular lock. The reason a particle does not come apart is
because it has no magnetic field to go into! Scientists today use an
electromagnetic field and that is the hold. By flowing particles through
a magnetic field, they would find that the particles come apart.
In calling gravity the
feeblest force because it only holds planets in their orbits scientists
have misjudged gravity. In an article as far back as 1911 in “Nature”, March
23rd, C. Brush said that to replace the attract hold of the earth to the moon
would require, as an example, a steel cable 500 miles in diameter, yet have no
weight of its own. Weak Force??
The force we identify as an
electromagnetic force is very limiting because the name ties electricity
to magnetism and locks it into your mind. Evidence has been presented
over and over that magnetic flowing current can be put to good use and it does
not manifest any electrical properties. A mental separation therefore
needs to be made between electron flow and magnetic flow.
We see therefore that
staying with the traditional position makes it difficult to advance. We cannot
simply try to modify these present force theories. Modification is not the
answer. Mental restructuring is the key to open the door.
For consideration, let us
identify a new force theory that allows for the needed expansion to carry
people into the upcoming free energy golden age of civilization. Let us group
in a positive way all the forces of the universe into three basic ones: light
particles, magnetism and molecular structures called electrons. From this
premise we can allow the activity of each to work as they are — not as
we have insisted they are.
Scientists have sought after
a fifth force, but just having the need to create a fifth force tells us we
have not been viewing structures accurately. Forces don’t hide themselves. The
issue herein is not that gravity can be counteracted but that gravity can be
seen as it really is, compressed magnetism.
From this qualification we can then gain the perspective needed to go forward.
What scientists want to call a fifth force is a rearrangement of their molecular structure system within the earth’s framework. Our info shows the simplicity that has been overlooked, avoided and discounted because of a limited idea of how the universe is constructed. People do not know all but if we so choose we may stand on the threshold of a new era that will save this planet. Scientists are seeking to break things into forces but it is all one force working together in each structure, the same force — not a differing one. The ONE force starts as neutral and then takes on the polarity or form necessary to accomplish a purpose.
The purpose or
polarity is provided to the neutral energy by the Total Mind and Total Energy
of the Universe. “Let there be light”, and the neutral energy transforms into
light, the thought sets the polarity and so it is with humans. The entire
Universe has a magnetic nature of transformation. Take away magnetism and the
universal system has no glue. By viewing magnetism as scientists do they have
eliminated the working of this force outside of our planet.
It is not that there is no gravity (magnetism) outside of our atmosphere, it is that it works on a differing principle.
Indeed magnetism is everywhere to some degree, and there are flowing magnetic
rivers throughout space that have specific polarities that can be used for
travel.
Because scientists have
decided there is only life on planet Earth, they also have decided that
everything everywhere works according to their theories and dictates, but the ozone
holes leave them with a question and that question is — where did we go wrong?
It will suffice to say that spray cans and chemicals are just a scapegoat, and
they know it.
We have created
technological monsters on this planet and we continue to feed them while they
kill us. Electricity is destroying the ozone shield and without that protection
physical life as we know it will end.
When we come to an
understanding that our world and its survival is based on restructuring our
thoughts then we will be ready to investigate the field of magnetic energy and
magnetic flow and how it relates to our earth and space travel, our earth and
the ozone holes, our earth and the whole of the planetary system. Nature seeks
to offer us a positive energy that will do for our planet what we are now
seeking to do through the acknowledgment of our carelessness. It will be of
great benefit if we will begin to understand that we can no longer move against
nature but must now utilize what is now being offered for the benefit of the
world. We have long overlooked, through greed, the use of magnetic free energy,
and the time is now at hand because our planet is soon to find itself extinct if we do not.
The Creator Force will
reveal to us how the universe functions, we just need
to honestly listen.
When the formula C – 2 + 14z = 710Y
+ 409 was handed to me on a scrap of paper many years ago, it was the answer to
someone’s question. The thought now is just WHO asked this question and why
wasn’t the answer given? We were told
that time within this Earth system is for our benefit but outside the Earth’s
realm, time does not exist.
About 100 years ago, Einstein asked a question
to which the answer is the formula we were given. While reading the book, The
Life and Times of Einstein by Ronald W. Clark, I found a statement quoting
Einstein, “I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in
this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to
know HIS thoughts, the rest are details.”
I also had that attitude BEFORE the project
started. I already had Part #19 (page 88, in the book, Magnetic Energy to
Heal the Planet) machined for a Celestial Particle Transmuter.
We were given data that, to me, was incomplete; so I asked, “Is this aluminum
armature plate, here in my hand, the actual part needed for this motor?” Like Einstein, my question was direct, as I
needed answers to assemble the unit. Guess what! I learned that the Creator is
totally into details. All the years of teaching times were all about details.
The following answer directed at my aluminum
armature plate is written word for word, (received on Feb. 5, 1985- God
speaking). “The radical change in the elements produces a captivity of power
that is generated from a newly produced source. The capacity of magnetism is in
sequence and the exchange of neutrons is inexhaustible. To further prove this,
the ions are distributed at random spacing by a molecular change from within
the generating source and so when EINSTEIN SAID THAT THE RELATIVE RELATIONSHIP
OF ONE PARTICLE TO ANOTHER DIDN’T MATTER, he was in ERROR. Time has proven this
to be so. The problem with redistribution has never been the problem. The
problem has always been the manner in which the redistribution takes place.
When a molecular structure breaks down there is a transfer of energy to the
greatest part, which is the attracting force; therefore, we see that all parts
are not equal in producing a generating force. The conductive material is
therefore of the greatest importance. It is the material that needs to be
observed. The ratio of revolutions to the speed of the generating force needs
to compensate. When you gear down, less capacitors are
needed. North to north creates this effect. Polarity is affected and the
desired effect is achieved. We need to
always review this as we think on capacitation and
its effect on not only the individual parts, but also the whole. All things are
relative to the existing conditions.” (Note: this statement is about the
Celestial Particle Transmuter.)
I studied this over and over, but was it saying
that my aluminum plate COULD BE USED? I did not ask again, but soon after this
event, the TiAlCo-B metal was called the proper
conductive material for the SAME SIZE armature plate.
Einstein had many deep thoughts that were in
keeping with information we were given. Let us review a letter he wrote to
Marcel Grossmann in April 1901 and add clarifying comments to show how it
relates to the formula we were given. His letter states, “I have got a few
wonderful ideas in my head which have to be worked out in due course. I am now
almost sure that my theory of the power of attraction of atoms can be
extended to gases and that the characteristic constants, for nearly all
elements could be specified without undue difficulty.
(Note: The Universe functions with the action
of attract/attract.)
(Note: we were told that magnetism is a constant.)
Then the question of the inner relationship of
molecular forces will also take a decisive step forward. Perhaps the researches
of others directed to different goals will ultimately prove the theory. In that
case I shall then use all I have so far achieved in the field of molecular
attraction in my doctor’s thesis.
(Note: we were told all energy is magnetic
molecular structures.) It is a
magnificent feeling to recognize the unity of a complex of phenomena, which
appear to be things quite apart from the direct visible truth,” (page 52 in The
Life and Times of Einstein). (Note: we were told there is only one force in
the Universe. Take away magnetism and the universal system has no glue.
Magnetism is the property which holds all particles together and magnetism is
the property that unlocks the molecular lock.)
Also, in this same book, it tells about Felix Ehrenhaft, a friend of Einstein, who held the Chair of
Experimental Physics at the
I guess timing is everything. If God had
someone hand Einstein the formula around April 1901, would he have had a
totally different view of the universe? It seems once the THEORY OF RELATIVITY
pushed him into the light as the new messiah, the theory was set in stone. Even
Einstein could not have changed it at that time.
Present theories, which are basically the same
as they were 100 years ago, do not allow the formula to be considered; yet it
is the answer to Einstein’s question on how God created this world. My shortcoming
is that I tried to focus only on parts, thinking that distracting my energy on
‘universal thoughts’ might send the project on a different path.
One thought came to mind many times. It was
this. ‘As magnetic light came to Earth from Jupiter and formed into 710 units
of combustible factors, these factors were identified as a
combination of EARTH, air, sound, speed and light. Did this mean the
Creator had to have some DIRT – that is earth or matter to start to form the
710 units of combustible factors? I WANTED this answer, but only in my mind,
and not as a spoken question at a teaching time. A shocking event happened as I
wondered about where the stuff was located which became ‘Y’, the combustible
factor. Was the word EARTH an
identifiable LOCATION, a place where air, sound, speed and light all formed
into 710 units of combustible factors?
I’m still not positive if this EVENT is a teaching everyone is READY TO
RECEIVE, but am now telling it because it needs to be heard.
At one
time, when the project was about half-completed, our friend was visiting our
house—NO TEACHING (we thought). I was telling about a trip I took for Korlow Corporation with an 85 year old business associate
from SCORE division of the Small Business Administration, who never would admit
to being wrong about anything. I then told how the Sun was going down in the
West and I got onto the highway heading in that direction, toward the food
plant where I had an appointment to make a presentation on a line of equipment.
The old gentlemen said, “Jeddy, (Jerry) how do you
know which way to go?” I said, “The Company is due west and the Sun goes down
in the West,” He got very upset, saying, “Get off and ask, the Sun, the Sun, I
don’t care about the Sun.” Yes, to settle him down, I drove off the interstate
to a gas station and asked an attendant for directions. I felt really stupid
asking which way was West when you could clearly see the Sun setting. While
telling a story about my trip, our friend seemed to be getting a message,
because she walked to the center of our living room.
I then said to our friend, “I guess he never
knew the Earth rotates once around every 24 hours and that the Sun goes down in
the West each night. Are you ready for a shock? Our friend said, “That’s the bondage
teaching right there, and God is showing me this.” She then tried to rotate both hands above her
head as fast as possible. We smiled, thinking she invented a new dance. She was
very stern saying; “The Earth rotates faster than I can show you, and the
energy of our Solar System creates the ILLUSION that the Earth only rotates
once every 24 hours. You need to remember you were told that time is put on
this plane for our benefit, but out there time does not exist.” The Earth’s
rotation gives us time, 24 hours being a day.
We wanted to pat her on the head and say thank
you, but no, she felt our disbelief. She had us drive to a science display
where a fairly fast rotating fan blade was influenced by a strobe light in the
room, making the blade appear to be rotating very, very slowly. In fact, one
could turn the strobe light knob and make the blade appear to almost stop. Yet,
the blade never changed speed. She then said, “God wanted you to see this and
think about how our Earth is caused to LOOK LIKE it is rotating once in 24
hours when in fact it is spinning at a very fast rate. I asked her to show me
again the speed and she rotated her hands again, approximately 3-5 rotations
per second. I said are we saying that the Earth rotates 5 times 60 or 300 times
a minute? She replied, “Faster.”
Then I said, “How could a solid Earth get the
energy to rotate very fast.” We were then guided to read the book, The
Awesome Life Force by Joseph H. Cater. He stated that there are giant
underground caverns, but NO solid Earth.” He further stated, “Apparently, the
entire Earth pulsates in response to the cyclical pattern of the Sun, much like
the nature of the fundamental particles.” He then went on to say how in 1962
the
We were told the Earth rotates very fast,
INSIDE A MAGNETIC FIELD. What is this magnetic field? The formula could very well be this field
because the formula was called a “molecular structure just outside the Earth’s
rim (Ionosphere) which reads C - 2 + 14Z = 710Y +409.” The Earth’s
rim was called our Ionosphere. So, if the 710 units of combustible factors FORM
somewhere, they utilize ONLY the Earth’s spinning ACTION as it produces AIR,
SOUND, SPEED and LIGHT. The Creator DOES NOT need any pre-made MATTER, such as
‘earth dirt’ (elements) to create the 409 elements.
We were told, “You are not the only ones living
on Earth.” What did this statement mean? If the Earth is spinning very fast,
then just under the Earth’s 800 mile thick outer crust, the inside surface of
this crust could manifest as compressed magnetism (or gravity) caused by
centrifugal force would allow the people in the inner Earth to function and
thrive inside the Earth. This centrifugal force could be why the oceans do not
go down into the inner part of the Earth. Their lighting system could be
exactly like the magnetic light box included in the book Magnetic Energy to
Heal the Planet.
As long as RADICAL thoughts are being put
forth, here is one that influenced my mind. On the Internet, there is a view
from space of Planet Earth. Each major city looks like a cluster of lights.
Yes, our Earth looks like a lit-up Christmas tree. Now, suppose someone FAR from our solar
system was viewing our Earth through a telescope and saw this same
‘earth-view.’ Would they say that they had discovered a WHOLE NEW UNIVERSE with
clusters of stars (as we keep reading in the newspaper and science magazines)?
We were told, “What they think they see is totally influenced by the theory of
Optics.” There are many factors that must be taken into account before science
can make Correct SIGHTING JUDGEMENTS. The theory of Optics is nowhere near an
exact science.
I now wish to address the subject of ‘Black
Holes.’ For example, we were told the pulsed energy leaves the Sun and is
attracted to the Earth four times faster than recorded light waves. So I asked,
“If the lit-up side of the Earth is WHITE-BRIGHT, why does the Earth, from
space, look like a blue ball? Does the
compressed magnetism of the Earth system ATTRACT the Sun’s energy with SO MUCH
FORCE that the reflected light stops going out into space? What makes light
STOP being light?” The answer given was, “All light and magnetism travel side
by side. When the light isn’t needed any more it stops.” Then I asked, “Did it
disappear?” The answer was “No, it returned to a magnetic form of energy.” We were told “There are magnetisms in the
Universe that have only been minutely touched.”
In the news today, we hear all this stuff about
black holes where light cannot escape. If the light emitting into space from
Earth weren’t NEEDED ANY MORE, would someone outside our galaxy say, “The
location called Earth is a BLACK HOLE?” Earth was called the vacuum of this
planetary system and vacuums are powerful attract
locations. This mindset on their part would be reinforced by the so-called Van
Allen belts, which would seem to be energy fields, which are trying to escape
from the Earth’s black hole. Is it not possible that these two energy fields
serve as magnetic poles or stabilizers to keep the Earth rotating at the
required velocity? What if these fields actually supply a steady flow of
magnetic free energy with each of them having POTENTIALLY DIFFERENT energy
charges? Science always wanted to know
why these fields maintain their exact position away from Earth. A fast spinning
Earth would give the Van Allen belts their present location because of
centrifugal force.
To sum up some of the major teachings, which
the formula might be telling us, we find that:
a) There is no molten iron core 2,000 miles
below the surface of the Earth. All of the energy ACTION now happening
(volcanoes, earthquakes, etc.) is because of the magnetic light energy beam,
which travels to Earth from Jupiter at a 14-degree angular path.
b) The Earth is NOW growing and has been
growing larger for a time frame that we cannot even imagine. Yes, at one time I
asked how old is the Earth, expecting the answer in years.
The message was “Are you looking for a number?”
I thought, “Great, here we go.
Everyone wants a number.” The
message was NOT exactly what was expected. We were to PICK OUR number like
maybe take a ONE and then put a million zeroes behind it. I think we were being
told that the Universe ALWAYS WAS, so forget asking the age of the Earth. The
message then was, “Within your present mental framework, certain knowledge is beyond
your understanding.”
c) The formula also tells us that the Earth is
a major circuit between the energy sent from Jupiter to Earth then from Earth
to the Sun. Many times we were told that to check the speed at which the Earth
and Sun respond to each other, Science should review atomic/nuclear bomb
explosions. EVERY TIME a bomb exploded, the Sun responded within a count of ONE
SECOND with Sun flares that have been recorded.
Another example is that Sky Lab’s decreasing orbit was blamed on the
scientists who determined the orbit. They said it was not high enough and this
caused it to come crashing down. Science
could check the dates/times to prove that every time a nuclear bomb was set off
(and there were hundreds) the energy from the Sun flared up and pushed the Sky
Lab into a lower orbit. This eventually caused it to crash to Earth when it
should have stayed in orbit for many, many years.
The Sun’s heat is located basically on its
EXTERIOR and it is a magnetic heat not nearly as hot as stated in the present
Science teaching. The Sun was identified during our teaching as being BASICALLY
HOLLOW proving that the Sun is not the source of the force. Since there
is not a core, the Sun needs to get its energy from the center of the Universe
then onto Jupiter. This is why in the formula, Jupiter
is called the center of our Solar System--not the SUN. One mental block to
understanding this is that the planets do not go around Jupiter; they travel
around the Sun. The Creator arranged the magnetic circuit to where the planets
go around the Sun. To speculate further on why can be done another time. The
Sun was created to last forever with only one negative event that could cause
it to be destroyed. That was humankind’s FREE CHOICE or the ability to destroy
the Sun by destroying the Earth’s magnetic circuit, and this event is happening
RIGHT NOW because of the destruction of the Ionosphere caused by the worldwide
overuse of electricity.
The formula tells where the energy comes from
and answers Einstein’s basic question about how God made the world. I asked if
the Sun cools, what happens to the Universe? Will it also start to run down
causing entropy? The answer was stated
before, but is a point that needs restating. We were told, “The Universe does
not operate on our idea of one, two, three order. The Universe does its thing
in a pattern as needed while repeating in a random sequence.” This action
allows a continuous transmutation process to maintain the Universe as
pre-ordained. So, if our Solar System is changed back to pure magnetic free
energy, this energy gets recycled to another location. We were told, “Nothing
is ever wasted. There are no particle ashes. Everything returns to a particle
balance.”
I think the Master Builder, Creator of the
Universe LIKES to have someone pass along teachings which were sent to us
Earthlings, so don’t discount crop circles.
They have messages. For example, there are 409 separate rings in one of
the crop circles that just occurred weeks ago. The formula has 409 elements.
Wouldn’t it be a real event if the entire formula was printed exactly as we
were given it over fifteen years ago? Yes! My hope is that soon magnetic energy
will take its rightful place to meet our energy needs and we will usher in our
golden age of civilization.
Re:
Information about the formula which reads C – 2 +14Z = 710Y + 409
This formula and its history came to mind as I
was reading the book titled The Life and Times of Einstein by Ronald W.
Clark. It seems a Sir William Bragg, the Director of the Royal Institution
asked the Congress in 1927, “Is everything that has already happened
a PARTICLE and everything in the future a wave?” It seems his son spoke up and
said, “The advancing sieve of time coagulates waves into particles at the
moment NOW.”
These are very deep thoughts from way back in
1927, but can we see the formula in them?
To find an answer, we focus on a statement printed in the book titled, Antigravity,
the Dream Made Reality by John R.R. Searl. He stated on page 38, “The earth would have
been EXPANDING from the Center since it first formed. This was the best
explanation for “continental drift; but a reason for the expanding earth could not
be found. Geographers would welcome the idea, for the land masses have been
shown to fit neatly together on a sphere of about half the size of the earth…”
Searl then goes on to say, “The creation fields or glowing magnetic cores at
the center of cosmic bodies must somehow originate.” We were told the formula was very
important but at the time our focus was on getting the data to complete the
Celestial Particle Transmuter.
At this time, let us retrace the events that
were happening as we got the formula. In the early months of 1985, God told our
partner exactly this, “There is a molecular structure that reads, C – 2 +14Z = 710Y
+ 409. We thought that this formula was only to explain the speed of light and
we had no interest to get more deeply involved in seeking more understanding.
Then, much later on
I think my next question was “What is
energy?” The answer was, “Energy is the
power by which anything acts effectively and changes.” Is this saying the SAME
THING as the presently held science statement which is, “Energy is the ability
to do work?”
Let us ponder some thoughts. When the
combination of the 710 units of combustible factors do their transmuting into
409 elements, can we say this action is WORK?
The Creator does not WORK at keeping the Universe in operation, likened
to some big WHEEL WATCHER in the Heavens. No, saying “Energy is the power by
which anything acts effectively and changes” is the Creator’s message as to
what energy is. That is why we were told, “The Creator is Spirit, Total Mind
and Total Energy,” and has no need to work.
Back to the formula. At that time we were writing a letter to Professor Rowland on
There is a molecular structure, just outside
the earth’s rim that reads: C – 2 +14Z = 710Y + 409. Y is the
combustible factor of the elements. These elements are a combination of
earth, air, sound, speed and light. In order for an energy
to operate it has to exist within these elements. It is important to note that
light is not the major factor here. The weather has nothing to do with
what is called ‘atmospheric conditions,’ but is caused by a particle (see
formula) that is outside the earth’s atmosphere but within reach. Since this
particle has to do with equal existing conditions within the earth’s
atmosphere, it needs a work arm or force to carry out its commands. This
force now is identified as gravity and that evaluation is the mental
boundary. Gravity is not a giant magnet in the earth pulling everything
downward; gravity is compressed magnetism. This compressed magnetism
within the earth continually changes its compression ever so slightly because
of the particle balance system just outside the earth’s rim. It is vital that
this balance system be kept intact…” We were told that the shaking has not even
started yet. Storms will increase in intensity with a continuous upheaval of
the elements as the Earth tries to bring itself back into balance.
Now back to focusing on the formula as it
relates to “waves coagulating into particles,” as
stated by William Bragg’s son. If the Creator caused the Earth to GROW likened
to a seed growing a tree, then why wouldn’t this same plan
be used to GROW every single star in the heavens?
This is not a brand new thought. About 1914, a
Dr. De Broglie had an idea, which he said was GUIDED
by Einstein. He said, “I had a sudden inspiration. Einstein’s wave particle
dualism was an absolutely general phenomenon extended to all physical nature
and that being the case, the motion of all particles, photons, electrons,
protons or any other, must be associated with the propagation of a wave.” Very interesting. We
might ask, was the Creator trying to give someone the
formula way back in 1914?
Today, maybe science thinks these are silly
questions but not too long ago they were asking these very questions. For example, at the Solvay
Congress held in 1930 in
This seems paradoxical, because just after
writing this I wanted to say my job is done, it is too much mind twisting to
take these thoughts further. But as
Einstein said, “The important thing is not to stop questioning, because curiosity
has its own reason for existence. One cannot help but be in awe when (one)
contemplates the mysteries of eternity.”
I will attempt to answer the Solvay Congress’ question if they would allow me to pick
the particle, which is to be
checked for its momentum. I will start with the teaching that magnetism is the
property which is holding the particle in question together. Thus, its momentum would need to be recorded
as a magnetic PULSE RATE because everything is made of magnetic structural
polarities.
In that an electron is the by-product of a
troubled magnetic field, I would push an almost invisible copper wire through a
microscopic volume of north/south magnets and attempt to watch the electron
form. All electricity is the by-product
of a troubled magnetic field. If we restrict the amount of PUSH through this
north/south field and control the copper volume, which is cutting the lines of
force, then we have but one more action to control. We need to cause an ON/OFF action to the
magnets, which would then totally control the NUMBER of flux lines that will be
troubled. Theoretically, if WATCHING the electron FORM does not affect its
‘forming action’ then yes, we can ascertain the position of a particle called
an electron being formed.
Throughout all the years of teaching, NOT
ONCE did the Creator say that electrons can be found SPINNING around atoms.
All electrons are formed, then transmute back into neutral magnetism, and then
reform again. I was thinking this was just fine but ‘SCHOOL teaching’ had me
adding how many electrons traveled around this and that. Is this teaching now part of the ‘wall of
continued ignorance’ as present theories were called. Why is this ‘electron spin’ teaching so
damaging? I finally found one
reason. Indirectly this teaching
reinforces the big-bang theory. Here is the connection.
Scientists, during the year 1925 held to the
view that “The electron in the BOHR atom was jumping from one orbit to another
without obvious CAUSE. They wondered, was there perhaps no real cause for such
movements.” If there were no identifiable cause, then were events SOLELY BY
CHANCE?
This thought process reinforced the idea of the
Universe running down because when testing electrons they found an energy LOSS
from one end of the electron flow to the next. As long as electrons were not
viewed as being FORMED then the action of magnetism being a constant had no
chance to be reviewed. We were told electrons do not just disappear but always
return to a particle balance. This particle balance has to do with a particular
magnetic polarity. If something causes a change to the given magnetic polarity
of a particle then the observed action of one electron jumping over to another
place becomes the balancing activity. The movement of every single electron has
a particular reason. It never moves without a purpose. That is the activity
that is in keeping with the statement that magnetism is a constant, thus when a
molecular structure breaks down and is USED to its maximum potential it FORMS a
new molecular structure.
I asked, at one time, “Surely something FEEDS
the Earth system IF the teaching about everything running down (entropy) is
false.” I think the answer given which FITS this comment was as follows. It
reads (in part) “The generating force of the ionic atmosphere is not produced
by the calculative measurement of neutrons but by the co-existence of energy
within the structure of the Universe…”
What are we talking about here?
The Creator told us that “Energy is the power by which anything acts
effectively and changes. The Creator is the Energy and is constantly making
changes that act effectively to keep the Universe functioning. One of these
changes then must be that God is creating the conditions by which there is a
co-existence of energy within the structure of the Universe. Now we get a
better view of what it means to say that energy is not work. So with all that
activity, God is not working, God is manifesting as Substance which is
Spirit—Total Mind and Total Energy.
Would a running Celestial
Particle Transmuter serve as
proof for a Unified Field Theory?
A call
from the past. I thought
my writing on this scientific stuff ended with after years of not hearing from
this person, he called to again seek my help to construct an anti-gravity
device. I was run down with trying to tell him gravity is simply compressed
magnetism but he never for a moment could believe it. Yes, he was smart enough to teach advanced
science in a University, but constructing some anti-gravity hardware consumed
his total life. It was difficult to
simply say, ‘I’m not interested,’ while wondering if all scientists felt like
he did.
Yes, during one of the
teaching times, I did ask for some method to show visible PROOF that gravity is
compressed magnetism. The answer given is on page 95 in the book, Magnetic
Energy to Heal the Planet, where it tells about how a ball bearing is
pulled off a permanent magnet by a piece of iron. The ball continues to adhere to the iron even
many inches away from the magnet. In fact I took this very ball test to the
International Convention for Free Energy and showed this test to MANY
people. Not one person said it proved a
single thing about how gravity is compressed magnetism. I talked myself blue
trying to say the ball stays on the iron because the PUSH of the compressed
magnetism cannot happen because the iron is blocking this energy’s movement
downward. Because of this, the steel ball has NO weight. Forget it.
It seemed I was trying to swim upstream getting nowhere. However,
something kept me going because surely science wanted an overview of a grand
Unified Field Theory. In my mind was the
thought that if scientists only knew that there is no such thing as gravity (only
that this force is compressed magnetism) surely it explains EVERYTHING.
Well the science community
spent a lot of effort identifying so called weak forces, strong forces,
electromagnetic forces, electrostatic forces, and so on including the force of
gravity. Thus it seems that NOBODY has
the right to explain all these forces as compressed magnetism. It is too SIMPLE.
For example, Albert Einstein
stated, “It would of course be a great step forward if we succeeded in
combining the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field into a single
structure. Only then could the era in theoretical physics inaugurated by
Faraday and Clerk Maxwell be brought to a satisfactory close.”
This subject has some humor
to it. When we got the recorded message
that gravity is simply compressed magnetism, my actual thought was, “let’s not
change the subject, I’d rather keep our focus on the magnet motor parts.” And here we were being given knowledge that
EINSTEIN searched for all his life. There is something here to laugh or cry
about, but who knows which.
It seems as I write on this
subject that the best way to get interesting ‘
This business of trying to
tie electricity to gravity has had interesting consequences. For example, some
years ago a Professor Francis E. Nipher of the St.
Louis Academy of Science proved by laboratory experiments that Gravitation can
be nullified and even converted into repulsion by electric currents properly
applied. In fact, about
We need to focus on HOW his
experiment might have actually been proving that gravity is compressed
magnetism. Why? We can be found to have
CLOSED MINDS by saying he never actually accomplished this test. It seems he
had two lead spheres hanging close to each other, and then charged each ball
for 15 or 20 minutes with an alternating current of 20 amperes. The results
were that the downward weight of the lead spheres was reduced to zero and then
the lead spheres moved AWAY from each other.
All the flowing electricity
is the product of a troubled magnetic field. So the lead spheres took on a
magnetic charge that responded to the compressed magnetism that was giving the
lead spheres their original weight. We
now go back to the BIG picture about this Earth’s energy field. Everything that
has weight has it because the compressed magnetism moves things DOWNWARD. So, when a (for example) mill hammer is
raised to a needed given distance, it falls downward with a force that can
smash heated steel bars. How did this
hammer STORE the energy?
At one of the teaching times,
I asked, “How does gravity actually work?”
This question was put forth even after we were given the
compressed magnetism data. I have the recorded answer given on
For weeks I tried to forget
this answer about “up
is to high, etc.” because it was just too much of a mind twister. Then on
It seems we were told a
falling object acquires a certain magnetic charge that can be measured with the
CORRECT magnetic metering system. So, if
we take the gravitation experiments of Professor Nipher,
we can envision having a TEST falling object CARRY with it a capacitor type
charge (connected to a long grounding wire).
When discharged, the object’s released energy could negate the acquired
magnetic charge and simply allow the object to land on Earth without a crushing
downward force. I wondered, why did this subject about compressed magnetism get
FOCUSED toward HOW molecular structures break down? What’s the connection?
It seems that the scientific
community wants answers that address the generation or destruction of an atom
or electron or whatever other items to which they gave names. Getting this
basic knowledge they THINK that the origin of gravitation will finally be
understood. So where does the compressed
magnetism (gravity) actually start and how did it get there? All of everything is a form of magnetism but
within the Earth’s system, the magnetism is MORE compressed than in outer
space. This compressed magnetism is the
catalyst for ALL energy and it co-exists, and is sustained by the energy of the
Universe. So the compressed magnetism is
not derived from the aether, it IS the very energy of
the Universe.
As we were told that the
compressed magnetism manifests as PULSES not WAVES, does this knowledge offer
some HOPE of experimental verification to finally prove that gravity is in fact
compressed magnetism? This answer
hopefully is yes and one day testing will show (as we were told) that this
compressed magnetism is NOT the same for all parts of the Earth’s surface. This
compressed magnetism, being a force throughout the Universe manifests as a
pulse in order to travel at the needed speed that is an ALMOST infinite
velocity.
It would seem then that ONLY
when this compressed magnetism is actively being TRANSMUTED into other forms of
energy would it offer a SPEED FACTOR, which can be
recorded. This could be why we were told
that “a blending of magnetic circuitry is the method to capture this energy for
recording purposes.”
Printed in Nature,
dated
This statement comes closest
to the teachings we were given. We were told, “There is only ONE FORCE- take
away magnetism and the Universal system has no glue.” Today, most physicists hold to the view that
it is a GRAVITATIONAL pull that keeps the ionic atmosphere in place. This concept was called a state of
confinement that spells DOOM for Earth. WHY? Would changing this force's NAME
to ‘compressed magnetism’ open some door of understanding? The answer must be YES, but how is that
possible? I’ll print the answer given,
but this answer demands a lot of deep thought.
Recorded around 1985, it
reads in part, “The magnetic field of the collective bodies within the Universe
has nothing to do with the principle of magnetic energy. It does have to do
with a source of energy thought about but untapped by humankind. Untapped because theories
have already been formed as mental boundaries restricting man’s inventive
possibilities. Humankind is on a
threshold of being able to review all of the impossibilities that they
themselves have made impossible previously.
There is available an unlimited, untapped resource of energy, yet man
thinks that the beginning and end of it are encompassed only within the
Earth. He is about to learn how wrong he
is.”
One moment: Let us assume time as we see it, as
we measure it, does not apply to the Universe. Events truly occur in only one
moment of now. How is it that we can
exist with the perception of events occurring one after another yet still be in
the same moment without the existence of time? What is changing is the vibrational state of things, we
are all passing through the perception of change which occurs through a vibrational shift. The earth is a multidimensional energy
system that facilitates an infinitely complex array of vibrational
shifting for all interactions within its system. All events that have occurred
are occurring right now, it is our perception that keeps moving forward. In the
moment of now, which is all there is, any event can be viewed by perceiving
that event's vibrations. So if everything already exists, then how do we have
the ability to choose? Aren't all of our choices already made? All possible
events already exist for people to perceive. The earth is constantly receiving
instantaneously all the energy necessary, all the combinations of vibrations
necessary, at every moment to make our perceptual experience fully functioning.
We are free to choose any possible path and the energy will instantly be
provided for us to experience, or literally create anything we want. How
does the earth facilitate this storage of events within its system? The earth
vibrates extremely fast allowing a whole new set of events to be stored with
each new vibration. All eternity happens in one moment in the sense that an
infinite number of events can happen simultaneously. The events do not spread
out horizontally across a time line, but they happen simultaneously, with our
perception moving through them. It may help to view time vertically, instead of
horizontally, as if all events are happening in one moment as we view some of
them. The earth spins at a nearly infinite velocity to accommodate the magnetic
system of vibration for storing an infinite number of events simultaneously.
The earth does not look like a blur because of the syncronization
we have with the earth vibrationally. Our entire
existence and our perception of our existence all relates to our vibrational state. An analogy would be the many ways cars
can be viewed while driving on a freeway. Standing still, the cars drive by as
we view them, driving in the same direction we observe the cars around us at
similar speeds, driving in the opposite direction we see even less detail of
the cars as they speed by. If you could keep your perception still, you would
observe life's events pass by like standing on the side of the road. You can
move your perception quickly through time to see many events happen quickly. Or
you can do what you normally do and perceive events as you move along with
them. Each perception change is a change in vibration.
Now let's take the analogy a little further. All existence, all events, all matter exists at certain vibrations. Stand in one spot and view the physical